Ignet
Search (e.g., vaccine, IFNG): Help
About
Home
Introduction
Statistics
Programs
Dignet
Gene
GenePair
BioSummarAI
Help & Docs
Documents
Help
FAQs
Links
Acknowledge
Disclaimer
Contact Us
UM Logo

UMMS Logo

UMMS Logo

Gene Information

Gene symbol: EGR1

Gene name: early growth response 1

HGNC ID: 3238

Synonyms: TIS8, G0S30, NGFI-A, KROX-24, ZIF-268, AT225, ZNF225

Related Genes

# Gene Symbol Number of hits
1 APOD 1 hits
2 AREG 1 hits
3 CTSS 1 hits
4 EGF 1 hits
5 EGFR 1 hits
6 EPHB2 1 hits
7 EREG 1 hits
8 HBEGF 1 hits
9 HLA-B 1 hits
10 IFIT3 1 hits
11 IKBKE 1 hits
12 MAPK3 1 hits
13 MYC 1 hits
14 NFKB1 1 hits
15 NT5C3 1 hits
16 STAT1 1 hits
17 TP53 1 hits

Related Sentences

# PMID Sentence
1 12810866 These include: cathepsin S, oligoadenylate synthetase (OAS), GARG49/IRG2, lymphocyte antigen-6A (Ly-6A), macrophage activation gene-2 (Mpa2), early growth response gene1 (Egr1), pyrimidine 5'-nucleotidase (P5N), apolipoprotein D (ApoD) and STAT1.
2 12810866 In addition, GARG49, STAT1, cathepsin S and ApoD are known to be upregulated in the CNS by Sindbis virus, an alphavirus, and this supports the proposal that common host cell pathways are activated in the CNS by different neurotropic viruses.
3 20190820 Mutant p53 initiates a feedback loop that involves Egr-1/EGF receptor/ERK in prostate cancer cells.
4 20190820 This study shows that in prostate cell lines in culture, Egr-1 overexpression correlated with an alteration of p53 activity because of the expression of SV40 large T-antigen or because of a mutation in the TP53 gene.
5 20190820 In cells containing altered p53 activity, Egr-1 expression was abolished by pharmacological inhibition or RNAi silencing of p53.
6 20190820 Although forced expression of wild-type p53 was not sufficient to trigger Egr-1 transcription, four different mutants of p53 were shown to induce Egr-1.
7 20190820 Direct binding of p53 to the EGR1 promoter could not be detected.
8 20190820 Instead, Egr-1 transcription was driven by the ERK1/2 pathway, as it was abrogated by specific inhibitors of MEK.
9 20190820 Egr-1 increased the transcription of HB-EGF (epidermal growth factor), amphiregulin and epiregulin, resulting in autocrine activation of the EGF receptor (EGFR) and downstream MEK/ERK cascade.
10 20190820 Thus, mutant p53 initiates a feedback loop that involves ERK1/2-mediated transactivation of Egr-1, which in turn increases the secretion of EGFR ligands and stimulates the EGFR signaling pathway.
11 20190820 Finally, p53 may further regulate this feedback loop by altering the level of EGFR expression.
12 20190820 Mutant p53 initiates a feedback loop that involves Egr-1/EGF receptor/ERK in prostate cancer cells.
13 20190820 This study shows that in prostate cell lines in culture, Egr-1 overexpression correlated with an alteration of p53 activity because of the expression of SV40 large T-antigen or because of a mutation in the TP53 gene.
14 20190820 In cells containing altered p53 activity, Egr-1 expression was abolished by pharmacological inhibition or RNAi silencing of p53.
15 20190820 Although forced expression of wild-type p53 was not sufficient to trigger Egr-1 transcription, four different mutants of p53 were shown to induce Egr-1.
16 20190820 Direct binding of p53 to the EGR1 promoter could not be detected.
17 20190820 Instead, Egr-1 transcription was driven by the ERK1/2 pathway, as it was abrogated by specific inhibitors of MEK.
18 20190820 Egr-1 increased the transcription of HB-EGF (epidermal growth factor), amphiregulin and epiregulin, resulting in autocrine activation of the EGF receptor (EGFR) and downstream MEK/ERK cascade.
19 20190820 Thus, mutant p53 initiates a feedback loop that involves ERK1/2-mediated transactivation of Egr-1, which in turn increases the secretion of EGFR ligands and stimulates the EGFR signaling pathway.
20 20190820 Finally, p53 may further regulate this feedback loop by altering the level of EGFR expression.
21 20190820 Mutant p53 initiates a feedback loop that involves Egr-1/EGF receptor/ERK in prostate cancer cells.
22 20190820 This study shows that in prostate cell lines in culture, Egr-1 overexpression correlated with an alteration of p53 activity because of the expression of SV40 large T-antigen or because of a mutation in the TP53 gene.
23 20190820 In cells containing altered p53 activity, Egr-1 expression was abolished by pharmacological inhibition or RNAi silencing of p53.
24 20190820 Although forced expression of wild-type p53 was not sufficient to trigger Egr-1 transcription, four different mutants of p53 were shown to induce Egr-1.
25 20190820 Direct binding of p53 to the EGR1 promoter could not be detected.
26 20190820 Instead, Egr-1 transcription was driven by the ERK1/2 pathway, as it was abrogated by specific inhibitors of MEK.
27 20190820 Egr-1 increased the transcription of HB-EGF (epidermal growth factor), amphiregulin and epiregulin, resulting in autocrine activation of the EGF receptor (EGFR) and downstream MEK/ERK cascade.
28 20190820 Thus, mutant p53 initiates a feedback loop that involves ERK1/2-mediated transactivation of Egr-1, which in turn increases the secretion of EGFR ligands and stimulates the EGFR signaling pathway.
29 20190820 Finally, p53 may further regulate this feedback loop by altering the level of EGFR expression.
30 20190820 Mutant p53 initiates a feedback loop that involves Egr-1/EGF receptor/ERK in prostate cancer cells.
31 20190820 This study shows that in prostate cell lines in culture, Egr-1 overexpression correlated with an alteration of p53 activity because of the expression of SV40 large T-antigen or because of a mutation in the TP53 gene.
32 20190820 In cells containing altered p53 activity, Egr-1 expression was abolished by pharmacological inhibition or RNAi silencing of p53.
33 20190820 Although forced expression of wild-type p53 was not sufficient to trigger Egr-1 transcription, four different mutants of p53 were shown to induce Egr-1.
34 20190820 Direct binding of p53 to the EGR1 promoter could not be detected.
35 20190820 Instead, Egr-1 transcription was driven by the ERK1/2 pathway, as it was abrogated by specific inhibitors of MEK.
36 20190820 Egr-1 increased the transcription of HB-EGF (epidermal growth factor), amphiregulin and epiregulin, resulting in autocrine activation of the EGF receptor (EGFR) and downstream MEK/ERK cascade.
37 20190820 Thus, mutant p53 initiates a feedback loop that involves ERK1/2-mediated transactivation of Egr-1, which in turn increases the secretion of EGFR ligands and stimulates the EGFR signaling pathway.
38 20190820 Finally, p53 may further regulate this feedback loop by altering the level of EGFR expression.
39 20190820 Mutant p53 initiates a feedback loop that involves Egr-1/EGF receptor/ERK in prostate cancer cells.
40 20190820 This study shows that in prostate cell lines in culture, Egr-1 overexpression correlated with an alteration of p53 activity because of the expression of SV40 large T-antigen or because of a mutation in the TP53 gene.
41 20190820 In cells containing altered p53 activity, Egr-1 expression was abolished by pharmacological inhibition or RNAi silencing of p53.
42 20190820 Although forced expression of wild-type p53 was not sufficient to trigger Egr-1 transcription, four different mutants of p53 were shown to induce Egr-1.
43 20190820 Direct binding of p53 to the EGR1 promoter could not be detected.
44 20190820 Instead, Egr-1 transcription was driven by the ERK1/2 pathway, as it was abrogated by specific inhibitors of MEK.
45 20190820 Egr-1 increased the transcription of HB-EGF (epidermal growth factor), amphiregulin and epiregulin, resulting in autocrine activation of the EGF receptor (EGFR) and downstream MEK/ERK cascade.
46 20190820 Thus, mutant p53 initiates a feedback loop that involves ERK1/2-mediated transactivation of Egr-1, which in turn increases the secretion of EGFR ligands and stimulates the EGFR signaling pathway.
47 20190820 Finally, p53 may further regulate this feedback loop by altering the level of EGFR expression.
48 20190820 Mutant p53 initiates a feedback loop that involves Egr-1/EGF receptor/ERK in prostate cancer cells.
49 20190820 This study shows that in prostate cell lines in culture, Egr-1 overexpression correlated with an alteration of p53 activity because of the expression of SV40 large T-antigen or because of a mutation in the TP53 gene.
50 20190820 In cells containing altered p53 activity, Egr-1 expression was abolished by pharmacological inhibition or RNAi silencing of p53.
51 20190820 Although forced expression of wild-type p53 was not sufficient to trigger Egr-1 transcription, four different mutants of p53 were shown to induce Egr-1.
52 20190820 Direct binding of p53 to the EGR1 promoter could not be detected.
53 20190820 Instead, Egr-1 transcription was driven by the ERK1/2 pathway, as it was abrogated by specific inhibitors of MEK.
54 20190820 Egr-1 increased the transcription of HB-EGF (epidermal growth factor), amphiregulin and epiregulin, resulting in autocrine activation of the EGF receptor (EGFR) and downstream MEK/ERK cascade.
55 20190820 Thus, mutant p53 initiates a feedback loop that involves ERK1/2-mediated transactivation of Egr-1, which in turn increases the secretion of EGFR ligands and stimulates the EGFR signaling pathway.
56 20190820 Finally, p53 may further regulate this feedback loop by altering the level of EGFR expression.
57 20190820 Mutant p53 initiates a feedback loop that involves Egr-1/EGF receptor/ERK in prostate cancer cells.
58 20190820 This study shows that in prostate cell lines in culture, Egr-1 overexpression correlated with an alteration of p53 activity because of the expression of SV40 large T-antigen or because of a mutation in the TP53 gene.
59 20190820 In cells containing altered p53 activity, Egr-1 expression was abolished by pharmacological inhibition or RNAi silencing of p53.
60 20190820 Although forced expression of wild-type p53 was not sufficient to trigger Egr-1 transcription, four different mutants of p53 were shown to induce Egr-1.
61 20190820 Direct binding of p53 to the EGR1 promoter could not be detected.
62 20190820 Instead, Egr-1 transcription was driven by the ERK1/2 pathway, as it was abrogated by specific inhibitors of MEK.
63 20190820 Egr-1 increased the transcription of HB-EGF (epidermal growth factor), amphiregulin and epiregulin, resulting in autocrine activation of the EGF receptor (EGFR) and downstream MEK/ERK cascade.
64 20190820 Thus, mutant p53 initiates a feedback loop that involves ERK1/2-mediated transactivation of Egr-1, which in turn increases the secretion of EGFR ligands and stimulates the EGFR signaling pathway.
65 20190820 Finally, p53 may further regulate this feedback loop by altering the level of EGFR expression.
66 20190820 Mutant p53 initiates a feedback loop that involves Egr-1/EGF receptor/ERK in prostate cancer cells.
67 20190820 This study shows that in prostate cell lines in culture, Egr-1 overexpression correlated with an alteration of p53 activity because of the expression of SV40 large T-antigen or because of a mutation in the TP53 gene.
68 20190820 In cells containing altered p53 activity, Egr-1 expression was abolished by pharmacological inhibition or RNAi silencing of p53.
69 20190820 Although forced expression of wild-type p53 was not sufficient to trigger Egr-1 transcription, four different mutants of p53 were shown to induce Egr-1.
70 20190820 Direct binding of p53 to the EGR1 promoter could not be detected.
71 20190820 Instead, Egr-1 transcription was driven by the ERK1/2 pathway, as it was abrogated by specific inhibitors of MEK.
72 20190820 Egr-1 increased the transcription of HB-EGF (epidermal growth factor), amphiregulin and epiregulin, resulting in autocrine activation of the EGF receptor (EGFR) and downstream MEK/ERK cascade.
73 20190820 Thus, mutant p53 initiates a feedback loop that involves ERK1/2-mediated transactivation of Egr-1, which in turn increases the secretion of EGFR ligands and stimulates the EGFR signaling pathway.
74 20190820 Finally, p53 may further regulate this feedback loop by altering the level of EGFR expression.
75 25324841 The 24-h network featured a small number of key hub and bottleneck gene nodes, including IKBKE, MYC, NFKB1, and EGR1 that differentiated the macrophage response to virulent and attenuated M. bovis strains, possibly via the modulation of host cell death mechanisms.